Pebble Homage & Antony Gormley’s Land

Pebble Homage
© Sue Jenkins 2016

Pebble Homage has been going on in Aldeburgh for the last 12 months. It’s a great idea – enjoy the pebbly beach, pick up a stone and imbue it with your thoughts. Some people have simply added their name, others have embellished with the art of illustration rather than words, and then there are other much more intellectual offerings.

                       image

The participative art installation at the Aldeburgh Beach Lookout has been running alongside the Antony Gormley installation on top of the Martello Tower further along the beach. The suggestion is to add a thought to your pebble inspired by the walk to the tower. Sadly, I’m not sure all participants had read the blurb!

Our walk to the Martello Tower was interrupted by sea wall works and we were diverted through the yacht club to get to our destination. Not actually sure if we were trespassing, but it was worth it to get a closer view of Gormley’s sculpture – one of a series of five figurative pieces called Land commissioned by The Landmark Trust. From the base of the tower, the human form seems to be constructed from numerous weathered metal cubes of varying sizes, looking rather like Iron Man contemplating the magnificent and powerful view of the churning North Sea. Gormley would like us to reflect alongside his five sculptures; find a moment for meditation and our place in this environment.

Land, Antony Gormley
© Sue Jenkins 2016

The Pebble Homage too, would like us to look at our relationship with the beach, the waves and the endless sky and bring something noteworthy to our pebble poetry. The pebbles will be returned to the beach waiting for some unsuspecting recipient to benefit from its message. Reading one or two of the stones, I suspect a lot of thought had gone into the process of choosing a clever phrase, not necessarily connected to the experience of stumbling across the beach, but to prove the writer as a serious philosophical being. Few people, though, had managed to get beyond the need to sign and date their pebble. And then there was the one that just said ‘Bum’.

image  image  image

So, I suppose in general, there’s a lot of self interest that emerges from such contemplation – no surprise there – and it has shown itself in the simplest sense with a name on a stone. But there’s a lot of humour too and its strangely satisfying to find one of the decorated pebbles beyond the immediate environs of the Lookout and adjacent table, having already started on its journey to spread its stoney message.

© Sue Jenkins 2016

 

Monet, Monet, Monet
it’s a Gardener’s World!

Royal Academy

I knew there was a reason I’d been avoiding the Monet to Matisse (Painting the Modern Garden) exhibition at the RA.

The world assumes that everyone loves Monet and the impressionists, and it’s probably right in most cases, but I’ve never been a great fan. Coupled with the frustration of seeing some of those beautiful flowers depicted with just a few touches of colour – never quite understood why I couldn’t achieve the same effect! Tripled by the realisation that most of the people there are going to be elderly garden-types… if you know what I mean…

But then a friend mentioned her interest in the exhibition and I dug out my ‘Friends’ card and off we trotted – typically for me, just as the exhibition was nearing its final days.

The exhibition is huge and, as expected, full of ladies of a certain age. I found it quite exhausting, both the overwhelming culture daze and the elderly visitors. I have a problem with people on their phones or listening to music in public places when they disappear into their own little world, oblivious to the people around them. The same is true of the aural guides dished out to exhibition visitors. Many times I was elbowed, barged and stepped on, having become invisible to the earphone-wearing elderly – and sometimes to those not even wearing headsets.

On occasion, the layout of the galleries made it difficult to view the paintings at their best (that is, from a distance for the Impressionist paintings) and I think I would have been happier to see a reduced number of paintings. For me, there were two outstanding Joaquín Sorollas on display and I could have done without the others, though I’d be happy to spend my day gazing at the vibrant beauty of all three Emil Nolde paintings chosen for the exhibition. The Making a Garden installation with its cold frames and miniature greenhouse falls short of showing the essential inspiration for the exhibition – the humble flowering plant, and serves only as a clever idea to house the archival material in Robert Carsen’s exhibition design. I thought I would enjoy his approach to displaying the paintings, but I’m not sure I quite got it.

The gallery exhibiting the ‘Gardens of Silence’ suggested that the gardens depicted were ‘devoid of human presence’, which I think is tenuous at best. Yes, I agree, there is not a living figure in the paintings, yet they are imbued with human presence. With the exception of one or two more natural gardens, the rest are full of man-made manicured lawns and trees, tables set for tea, lights burning in distant windows, decorative statues and urns and idealised landscaping.

There are some absolute treats though – the amazing (and huge) Agapanthus Triptych at the end of the exhibition – reunited in Europe for the first time in 65 years. The wall of Monet’s Water Lilies is interesting – of the five, my friend and I chose totally different favourites and second-bests, proving that it really is each to their own where art is concerned. We both agreed though, that in the Avant-Gardens gallery, Kandinsky’s amazing abstract Murnau The Garden II was the most appealing painting – and, for me, of the whole exhibition.

You can catch Painting the Modern Garden: Monet to Mattisse at the Royal Academy until 20 April 2016.

Shame on you, Greenwich Council, Ikea & English Heritage!

suejenx_sainsburys

Sainsbury’s forward-thinking eco-store was built in Greenwich in 2000 and has won many accolades – RIBA Journal Sustainability Award Winner, RIBA Regional Award Winner, Design Museum’s Design Sense Award, and shortlisted for the Stirling Prize.  When it opened, it scored the highest achievable environmental rating for a retail building and was the first store to be awarded an ‘excellent’ BREEAM rating too. In 2014 it was selected as one of the ‘100 Buildings for 100 Years’ by The Twentieth Century Society.

Sadly, less than two years later, the building is being demolished.

Sainsbury’s outgrew the building and, learning from its pioneering store, went on to build an ecologically-sound, energy-saving building up the road. The store and the site were sold to Ikea, who intend to replace it with a much larger building. In spite of widespread local opposition, Ikea were given permission to build a store in an already seriously congested area of south east London. Greenwich’s Labour-majority council approved the deal, regardless of objections by local councillors, both Labour and Conservative, and the public.

It would seem that in a world where we are continually trying to think of our children’s future by reducing greenhouse gases and traffic pollution, Greenwich Council would think twice about permitting the destruction of such an eco-friendly building and opening their arms to Ikea and its associated traffic nightmare. Greenwich is after all a thriving urban community, not an out-of-town retail park.

While The Twentieth Century Society were dishing out their award, Greenwich Council was plotting the building’s demise. An attempt to have the building listed was rejected by the Secretary of State for Culture, Sajid Javid, and English Heritage, who questioned its architectural importance. Sadly, its designer Paul Hinkin, latterly of Chetwoods Architects, died soon after the decision in the full knowledge that his pioneering retail building would be demolished.

suejenx_sainsburysrear  suejenx_sainsburysfacade  suejenx_sainsburyscloseup

From the moment Sainsbury’s Greenwich opened its doors, local shoppers were joined by architectural students, parties of Japanese tourists and alternative technology aficionados in admiring the finer points of the building. Now all we have to admire is a growing pile of rubble at the rear of the store, slowing making its way to the façade which will be demolished this weekend.

What a great message to send out to the world about our environmental credentials.

Shame on you all!